In Mozis example, multitude in the city-state of Kai-shu ate their first born to benefit their jr. sons. They would also abandon widowed mothers to prevent sacrilege of their household. These social practices were considered by the superiors to be administered correctly. Yet, Mozi argued that these practices ar surely non equivalent to ren (humane) and yi (moral). Therefore, traditions and customs cannot and need not to be adopted by people as they are subjected to the whims of the community superiors. In fact, a universal or natural tian ming should be applied to justify the social practices so as to qualify shi and fei, the righteous practices from the wicked ones. Our opponent has also reiterated the this opinion.
However, I would like to show that this is alone untrue. Mozis example of the Kai-shu culture distinctly is evident of the fact at that place are many cultures in the world. For instance, the funeral practice of the Arabian culture, which perfectly rebuke the practice of cremation; is entirely different from the Jewish practice of entombment.
Both cultures would view the other practice as unlawful and disrespectful of the dead. Yet, if natural standard or the universal standard holds true, then shouldnt funeral practices be standardized no matter where you are in the globe. Quoting from Mozi tian dao, the way of living in harmony and with visit to nature is universal no matter where you are. The example of funeral practices clearly rejects the motion and Mozis idea of universalism.
Returning to the example given by Mozi, the Kai-shu people has their own unique social practice. Mozi believed that similar to the head-in-the-clouds and extravagant practice by what Confucians propose, the two practice does not follow nature and thus is not well justified. However, our...If you privation to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment