What is Biomedical?

If we look at Kant's (1991, p. 186) " unconditioned imperative," we see that it is an honour able principle that mandates an action's morality based on its being willed as a universal law. In the boldness of the terminally ill patient scurvy in gigantic imposition, we can quite reasonable assume that providing them relief of that pain through available medication is a law that could be universally applied. Few individuals, knowing they are dying unheeding of any medical treatment, would wish to linger in long pain and suffering inste`d of being provhded morphine. Thus, from the perspective of the monotonic imperative, it is honorable to provide morphine to such patients as its semipermanent impact is outweighed by the short-term comfort it offers a patient suffering from immense pain.

We might also look at the ethical theory of return in order to survey the ethicality of providing morphine to a terminally ill patient suffering from enormous pain. The product of theories by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, the theory of utility proposes that that action which benefits the most numbers of people while harming the least number of people is an ethical action. In the racing shell of the terminally ill patient suffering enormous pain, it would be ethical nether the theory of utility to provide morphine to such a patient. This is because by provide morphine to the patient, the patient's pain

In conclusion, end-of-life issues continue to represent complex, ethical and legal issues that have no easy solutions.

In the case at hand, it is ethical to provide morphine to a terminally ill patient suffering excruciating pain, since this represents the only humane way to improve the patient's quality of life until they separate. Bialk (2004, p. 88) recommends that when patients are able to discuss end-of-life decisions with healthcare providers, the practitioner should use the following framework to better determine which course of action should be interpreted:

is alleviated, the physician has offered the only relief he has at his disposal to improve the patient's condition, and the patient's friends and congenators do not have to watch their relative or friend suffer in excruciating pain. Therefore, supplying the patient with morphine benefits many people while harming none. fleck it may hasten the death of the patient, the patient will die regardless. Likewise, providing morphine to the patient is the only way to provide them with relief, improving quality of life, during the time he or she has left to live. Therefore, under the theory of utility, providing morphine to such a patient
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.