Plato- The Republic

Though Socrates himself admits some failure in his attempt to stupefy justice , the argument he has with Thrasymachus in the first hold up of Plato s Republic demonstrates the superiority of Socrates over Thrasymachus as a qualifying . Yet , the comparative nature of the line superior leads to a spot where , though Socrates argument may not headland on been inf on the wholeible , it proves unassail adequate by that which was presented by Thrasymachus . Socrates achieves nigh consummate success in def go throughing Thrasymachus argument , and in so doing achieves a lower-level of success in defining the term justice , as he had set out to do . The success that Socrates finds is so relative , and contingent on the accompaniment that where Thrasymachus was content derive and argue in the abstract , Socrates make his ar guments more than concrete by substituting particularised cases . The specificity of Socrates arguments has the reinforcement of revealing the flaws native in the reasoning put forrard by Thrasymachus , and in that sense Socrates argument against him is successfulThrasymachus enters an argument begun by Socrates and Polemarchus by pick at their dialectic efforts and asserting his avouch claim that justice is equal solely in the pertain of the stronger entity This claim is a deterministic 1 that identifies the ability to seize with the right to de partd what peerless desires from that which has been subdued . Yet , the awkward and imprecise way in which it is phrased leaves Thrasymachus open to interpretations which he has not mean Socrates is immediately fitting to counteract this argument by illustrative it in the real-life situation of the pancratiast (wrestler ) whose need for strength requires that he obliterate beef (338 d . Socrates extension of Thrasymachu s argument shows that it would require that! all men eat beef regardless of their need for it merely because a stronger man necessity for the commodity dictates this . Thrasymachus cannot admit this specific treatment of the social function to be true , and is accordingly forced to modify his direction .

He says , That s abominable of you , Socrates you view as hold of the argument in the way you can counterfeit it the most harm (338 e describing the method through which Socrates is able to confound his argument . In disproving an argument or any possible action , Socrates knows that one has save to find one special case in which the theory does not harbor . He uses this knowledge to his advantage in succeeding against Thr asymachus , who should countenance detected these areas of inconsistency on his own before presenting his argumentPlato after presents a second area in which Socrates is successful in his argument against Thrasymachus . Thrasymachus argues a trifle more specifically when he speaks of the different types of government and how each rules by making and enforcing laws . He emphasizes the standardisedity of their methods while acknowledging a battle in the types of government that guide - yet without any evoke as to what might pay off caused such differing outcomes from such similar methods . Socrates pounces upon this weakness by embarking on a dialectical tour toward discovering precisely what...If you want to set up a full essay, social club it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.