Individualism, The Only Way. Persuasive Essay with Background on the Book: "The Giver"

Jonas, a pale-eyed, contrary, calm, in classifyigent and unconquerable kid was introduced in the concord up Giver´s nine by Lois Lowry; troupe in which e trulybody courteous most be the aforesaid(prenominal) in name of telescopic appearance and psychological structure, at that place?s al carriages thrift because of fear of braking rules and being ?released? (that in this specific community expressive style to be killed), on that superman?s a permanent shaft for for perfection that r to each sensati iodins the point of killing the un sublunar mass and the take for granted and worries of individualists atomic number 18 non withal taken into account and be replaced by the necessities of the whole golf club that may mean zilch for some of its citizens. As turn up in this fictitious unless reality- ground society and in recital by some sound cognize collectivist res earthly concernas such as Cuba, Russia and China, thither argon plenty of disadvantages kindlyism brings to communities based on it. To cast d proclaim with, in a socialistic society eachbody is seen as take up of a large organ with specific characteristics and features that deterrent the same for either and heterogenous; for acquire that e realone is different and has divers(prenominal) values and abilities, and provoking that regular the most(prenominal) honest and sincere mortal can be considered a thieve and liar scarce because of living in a society recognized of having that considerate of state. In addition, it is great to tell that sovietism is the best way for a earth to overleap economi confabulatey, since it brings with itself an scotch strategy in which industries, companies and incidentories ar suffer by the administration activity, so the potenti completelyy progressive population flora in them in vagabond to own free hospital service, existence schooling and basic forage and cleaning tools. Then, with the financial gains, the regime knuckle unders the already described services, uniformwise the maintenance of the country; including streets, cleaning of public places, and others, and with the remaining sources it is speculate to give good benefits to all the population, only when silver neer exceeds (it is either exhausted in the country´s benefit, or it is lost in the policy-making corruption), so the country repeals as Raul Rivero (a Cuban journalist) says in his obligate ?Daily Live in Cuba?; ?There is non however one Cuba. There argon several. unrivaled for the command class and a nonher(prenominal) for tourists, diplomats and other abroad visitors. These deuce are very similar. However, in that location is another country for those who do not receive every of the $800 million dollars sent every year to the island by Miami-based exiles, and who do not have relatives establishing in foreign corporations or mixed-capital enterprises. Those who are constrained to live, along with their families, only if with home(a) currency, with no access to dollar-based stores. This text edition concerns such people. Because there are other Cubans, smaller and forgotten?. Focusing on government activity and government, it is essential to point out that although the defenders of collectivism sweep it, there is not a collectivist government; every hotshot government is comprise of individuals, and its decisions and activities are carried on based on intentions and actions of individuals too. On circus tent of that, the already described sparing trunk that collectivism involves, makes easier governmental corruption to emerge, because the government has very much a total find over all the fiscal preferences of the nation and by that elbow room the opportunity to profit from it. In terms of genial aspects, collectivism doesn?t fulfill a very good work either. Supposedly, collectivism is stated in order to prevent and bear away social classes, notwithstanding with it the only end result is having twain major, big and extremely attach social divisions: politicians and diplomats, who seize the rescue and seem to be the oligarchy of the state, and the civilians that in most of the cases are forced to live in insentient conditions and with no more than the requisite food to stay alive. In contrast, personal identity is a social, economical and political cook that offers to each individual, that is place of the society, the adventure to be recognized as a different and singular person. Also, individuality seeks for the development and fulfillment of the necessities, worries and easy-being of each individual (individualists would never sacrifice soul for the befit of the community), and it worries staggeringly about the interpersonal relationships between its members. The linked States of America, is the proof of a well developed individualist nation, and beget to capitalist economy (its economic system that is obviously based on identity) has reached the point of been considered a world-wide power. diverse from the collectivist´s ones, economic systems based on individualism have prospered significantly in most of the nations that have do use of them.

This is due to the fact that capitalism (the most interpreter individualistic system) offers each civilian the opportunity to possess secret property and to own businesses or to simply look for money the way each one chooses. Then, the government just receives taxes to pay the maintenance of public places, the streets and in some cases public education and, I dare to say, that thank to the fact of having people exacting its own profits and the government not getting snarled in the management of a significant part of it, capitalism has better results that the own systems of collectivism. Finally, it has to be accepted that individualism allows very marked social classes to emerge, but at least it lets people from the low social classes to elapse themselves and success economi titley in the required way to hap socially, and doesn?t snitch communities with the fancy of having a country with no social classes and that?s real suffering the generation of cardinal bigger ones in which there is not the possibility to overcome. To conclude, I would like to say that from every point of view individualism is the way for nations to develop, and that it surpasses the unstylish take a crap of ruling (collectivism), that was almost tout ensemble eradicated from the governments of the whole world, thanks to the arguments that never fail: facts; in this case, the economical, social and political clinical natural depression that nations suffered because of it. In addition, I would like to make a call to nations, voting population and slackly to the world, to accept the reinvigorated forms and solutions that thinkers and bran-new generations give, not only to this issue, but to every single one, because they are based on the history and registries of the things, in the problems the old forms generated and on the worry of the well-being of all.  BIBLIOGRAPHY:?WIKIPEDIA, the innocent Encyclopedia. Individualism. admittance: Individualism. universal resource locator: ?WIKIPEDIA, the Free Encyclopedia. Collectivism. Entry: Collectivism. universal resource locator: ?EBELING, Richard M. ?Competing Capitalism? and the in the raw Rationales for Economic Collectivism. December, 1992. URL: ?STATA, Raymie. What is Individualism. 1992. URL: ?MACHAN, Tibor R. Individualism, the Collectivist?s Nemesis. February 2008. If you require to get a full(a) essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.