Compare and Contrast two ethical theories.

In this essay I impart chosen to comp nuclear number 18 deuce opposing theories, Immanuel Kants absolutist deontological morality and Joseph Fletchers relativist situation ethics. The deontological ethics revolve aboutes on actions made according to vocation and the categorical imperative - which shows how acts are as such sober or bad. The situation ethics separate that no act is intrinsically near or bad, and that actions should b made according to love. From this scene it looks as thought Kants views were less(prenominal) personal than Fletchers, although in actuality both focus on the take up proceeds for humans. Deontological ethics is relate with actions, not consequences. To act with good designing but have a bad outcome is still incorrupt. Similarly if the intention is bad, then it is wrong in all circumstances and situations, eventide if it turns out for the best. If benefiting from the act is the pauperization for the action, it negates any morality from a g ood deed. To be good and act morally is to do ones transaction - duty macrocosm to obey moral faithfulness. ii things fill the mind with of all time new and change magnitude admiration and awe...the starry heavens supra me and the moral impartiality within me Kant (1788).

Kant believed that humans know the moral law through reason and without reference it the consequences, and that it was part of peoples duty not to be distracted by their emotions. If moral law dictates you ought to do something, it implies that it fanny be done, as it is not our duty to do the impossible. consequently there is no excuse not to obey inwrought moral law. Kant maintained humans work towards an ultim ate end in which human virtue and happiness ! is brought to dieher, and nicety prevails. This is what is known as the summum bonum. As it is impossible to... If you want to get a right essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay